(Per The Gay Agenda’s Sexuality Dictionary)

Well, “they/them” could be a puss-cis? But I think “they/them” “identifies” as a binary trestimile with a puss-cis head, and “non-binary.” Everyone knows what that means, right?

I was talking with an “identified” binary androsexual, who is a cultist of The Gay Agenda, and “they/them” told me that “they/them” “identifies” as being pansexual. “They/them” like to have sex with skillets or pans — preferably those pans that “identify” as cast iron — on the stove. Of course as with any other “identifying” the pans don’t actually have to be cast iron; it’s just important than they “identify” as cast iron. “They/them” “identifies” as a gynological gynesexual, but is not. Or upon reflection, was it dynosexual that “they/them” said? ”They/them” “identified” with being “identified” as an “identified” eliphantonic sexual “identified,” which is an addiction to the “identified” “monster cocks” that everyone who “identifies” as a guy has on the live cam sex site, CB. They also “identify” as cis-binary monotonous.

There are also the cultists of the Gay Agenda who “identify” with people with anal pimples and cysts. “They/them” also told me that “they/them’s” roommate is a “non-binary” podophilia who heavily “identifies” into cis-partialism, and especially “identifies” as boots, sandals and sneakers. Even though “they/them” is not boots, sandals and sneakers, but can easily change how they “identify” and make it up as they go along.

That’s one of the wonderful things about the Gay Agenda’s “identifying” rubbish. One doesn’t have to actually be anything these days. Instead it’s all about “identifying,” for example, one can “identify” as a tea drinker but never drink tea. “They/them” does know a friend who “identifies” sexually with potholes. The “monster” pot holes specifically — like the “monster cocks” — not the small ones, and “identifies” as into painting binary cis-nero penises over non-binary potholes.

In discreet corners, one hears rumours of non-binary cis-beastiality “identifying” with trimester non-cis, and gyno-puss-cis.

Okay. Have you had enough of this nonsense from the Gay Agenda? The corporate trash responsible for the Gay Agenda told me that “they/them” “identify” as complete idiots. Now that’s the most intelligent and articulate thing I’ve ever heard from “they/them.”

Had enough yet?

You know, maybe it’s time to go back to people being straight, gay or bisexual and if one cannot use those words and insists on using an acronym, here it is:

GLB. Period. That’s all that is needed.

If one cannot say or is afraid to say the word queer, then use GLB, if you must. GLB is all that’s necessary. Trans has nothing to do with same gender attraction so why are trans even part of the queer so-called “community?” Why has the queer so-called “community” become the dumping ground for any and everything that is not heterosexual? Trans should be their own thing.

And how many more fucking words have the fools of the Gay Agenda created for the word bi? What’s wrong with the word bi or bisexual? There’s no need for “homoflexible” or “heteroflexible” or “fluid” or “pansexual” when they all mean bisexual, bottom line. Have I told you how much I can’t stand the corporate trash who created this nonsense?

The time-honoured words straight, bi and gay have served us well and continue to serve us well for anyone having the intelligence to use them, and there is absolutely no reason to discontinue their use in the name of being “updated” or “cool” and conformist in order to conform in brainwashed conformity with the insanity of the Gay Agenda.

As for “I identify as,” that’s what the corporate trash responsible for the Gay Agenda dreamed up, that rubbish should be abandoned because it doesn’t make any sense. Anyone can “identify” as anything, such as a lamp post, for example, but that doesn’t mean that they are a lamp post. It’s time that people be gay, be bi or be straight rather than “identify” as gay, bi or straight. Be someone or something.

“I identify as gay” should be I AM Gay. Why does the insane Gay Agenda require so many words to say something? I am gay is shorter than “I identify as gay.” ”I identify as gay” sounds like the person has one foot in the closet. I am gay is an affirmative statement. ”I identify as gay” is not an affirmative statement. It can be read as: “I identify as gay, but I’m not gay.” One can “identify” as anything and make it up as they go along.

What idiots came up with this “identifying” nonsense?

And use the original rainbow flag. The “updated” versions look like a photo shopped mess designed by dysfunctional children. Look at this mess:

The Gay Agenda now has approximately 7 different flags. They’re different versions of rainbow and trans flags. Lost on them is the concept of having one clear and concise message with one flag. And again, trans should not be part of it. They should be their own thing.