Proud is the wrong word, just like much of what the Gay Agenda has dreamed up and the so-called gay “community” has accepted without question. Didn’t these people who dreamed up the Gay Agenda think anything through before they came up with this rubbish? And why did they think they were in any position to come up with this Agenda? Who are these self-appointed authorities? These are the same people who issued the decree upon the legalisation of gay marriage that queers must “assimilate” (blend in) with heterosexuals. Many queers interpreted that to mean go back in the closet and pretend to be straight. The queers I know said: I’m as “assimilated” with the straights as I care to be. Who do these people think they are who dictate what others should/must do?

One’s sexuality is just a matter of fact. Not something to be “proud” of.

“Proud” to be gay implies that gay guys are inferior to straight guys and somehow have to prove themselves, then they are “proud” to be gay.

It reminds me of the “gay adoption” fad of gay guys/couples having to adopt kids as if they feel they have to prove to straights that they can make just as good parents as heterosexuals. It should be pointed out that there are many awful heterosexual parents out there historically.

This is similar to that identity politics nonsense of the first this or the first that (the first Asian, the first Black, the first Latino, the first gay or lesbian appointed or elected to a position) having to prove themselves and that they can do a job just as good as or better than the white male heterosexual who came before them. I’ve seen that over and over: Too often they are worse than what came before them even though it was presumed that they would be more “progressive” as a minority, yet too often they turned out to be more conservative.

I’ve heard and or read the line, “He’s proud to be gay” many times. Why “proud?” Of course no one ever questions that statement and the choice of words because one is not supposed to challenge anything about the Gay Agenda, which being “proud to be gay” is part of.

But why would anyone be “proud” of their sexuality, whether they are gay, bi or straight? I’ve never heard anyone say, “I’m proud to be straight” except in mocking this “proud to be gay” nonsense.

I read this recently: “He is gay, out and proud.” Well, if one is gay and out, it’s clearly implied by being out that he’s secure with this sexuality. But why proud? To me, that’s a non sequitur.

To me and others I’ve talked with, that’s just the wrong word just like that “Pride” shit which is a major part of the Gay Agenda.

“Pride” was chosen I was told because queers are “proud” of their accomplishments. Well aren’t all people — regardless of their sexuality — “proud” of their accomplishments? But they don’t go around going on about “Pride” and “Proud.” Whoever dreamed this shit up apparently possessed no critical thinking skills what-so-ever and then those who latched on to it — the so-called “gay community” — didn’t question any of it either. They went along with it in lockstep because they thought they were supposed to. And that gave us the insanity called the Gay Agenda.

I was asked awhile back who dreamed up that alphabet shit with the “L” first when originally the “G” was first as in Gays and Lesbians. No one seems to know exactly how the “L” got moved to first place. I did read that after thousands of gay guys died from HIV/AIDS that lesbians decided to move the L to first place. Did they think there were not enough gay guys left to merit gay guys being first in GLB? Gee, that’s a terrific way of honouring the legacy of the work that gay guys did for the Movement by moving their ass to second place.

I refuse to use the alphabet rubbish because it’s all so divisive and divides people up into little groups leading to infighting. I use the word gay or queer. Take your pick. One word (Queer) is far more uniting of people as a group than reciting the increasingly long alphabet umpteen times. There are already two Qs in the thing. And how many more fucking letters do these corporate trash who run the Gay Agenda plan to add to the thing? And who ordered the corporate media to follow in lockstep the Gay Agenda as is the case worldwide?

But back to this “gay and proud” thing, one’s sexuality has nothing to do with being “proud.” Who goes around saying, “I’m so proud that I’m sexually attracted to the same gender and I’m so proud to have sex with the same gender as myself and I’m so proud to be in a relationship with a person of the same gender as myself?” If one were secure with one’s sexuality — rather than “proud” — all of that would be a given.

It’s really about one being secure — not “proud” — in their sexuality. “Proud” is too much, too extreme, it’s the wrong word, and it implies there is something wrong with being gay, if one feels the need to say they are “proud” to be gay. Another way of saying it: It also implies that the person who is gay thinks there is something wrong with being gay so he has to go to the extreme of being “proud” about being gay. Because again, why would anyone be “proud” of their sexuality. Nobody ever says they are proud of their hair colour or eye colour or how tall or how short they are or anything else the way they were born per their DNA. So why is anyone “proud” of being gay? (roll eyes)

Of course, I don’t expect anyone to agree with me because most have been brainwashed with this “proud” and “pride” thinking, and will continue to be in lockstep with the Gay Agenda, and they are obsessed with “Proud” and “Pride.”

And when one has to say they are “proud to be gay,” I’m not completely convinced they are “proud to be gay,” otherwise they wouldn’t feel the need to say that.