Probably. Many people have flipped out here in the Century of Insanity. It would seem so. Or are most people being who they really are and have been all along, but hid that from the public?
Or is Gavin Newsom merely being a typical politician, a political opportunist, like most politicians, and decided to cozy up to the far-right thinking he will go farther that way. Is he thinking that the convicted felon and sexual predator in the US Kremlin (formerly known as the White House) will favour him as a result of this change? Newsom uses the language of stagnant establishment politicians, such as “ask the tough question” and other tired lines. With politicians, why are questions always “tough questions?”
Gavin Newsom got a terrible review from one of the San Francisco websites for his first podcast with one of the convicted felon’s bigoted cultists (the “Make America Great Again” cult). I didn’t listen to the podcast but I read that Gavin mostly gave the far-right guy free-reign to say whatever he wanted and Newsom challenged very little of it. And when it came to the trans issue, Newsom agreed with the dude, which stunned some people, considering Gavin’s background. But I think those people were painting a broad brush when it comes to his background on Queer issues, which really had/has nothing to do with trans. Unless I missed it, I don’t remember Gavin ever making any statement about trans.
So again, Newsom is snuggling up to the far-right, specifically the cultists of the convicted felon and sexual predator. Am I surprised, considering his past and with Queer issues? No, not really. Very little surprises me based on my life experiences and especially when it comes to establishment politicians.
With Newsom, it’s the trans issue that he’s now in agreement with the far-right, specifically that trans male-to-“female” persons should not be allowed in women’s sports. Because the trans person in that instance looks like a female — in part due to hormone therapy — but still has their penis and scrotum. So Newsom says that men (obviously with a penis and scrotum) should not be allowed in women’s sports. I see his point using a 1930s-40s way of thinking, but we’ve all seen a dick and nuts and a girl’s pussy and tits, so what’s the big deal regardless of what the person is called? Why shouldn’t male to “female” people be in women’s sports? The women won’t be shocked to see a dick and nuts. They’ve seen dicks before and have probably been fucked by dicks. But Newsom says it’s about fairness, and that he has four daughters. He said his 13 year old son is a fan of the far-right guy that Gavin interviewed. Oh really?
One article I read about this gave Gavin Newsom’s history on Queer issues, and of course they used all of that Gay Agenda alphabet nonsense — I’m talking about all those fucking letters and increasingly long train of letters — which I refuse to type because I don’t use it myself and am sick of seeing it. It seems that the Gay Agenda has never had the intelligence to use one word: Queer or Gay, period. All that the alphabet nonsense does is to divide people up into little groups leading to infighting. It has never occurred to them that one word — Queer — can unite people. I am seeing more people using the word Queer. And in reality, trans has nothing to do with Queer or Gay. I’ll get to that in a moment.
Gavin Newsom started “gay marriage” in San Francisco, but that had nothing to do with trans. That’s why it was called “gay marriage.” Yeah, the T for trans was in that revisionist history “LGBTQ” nonsense (the original was GLB so why was the order of the letters changed?), even though the T shouldn’t be there at all because trans has nothing to do with gay, lesbian, bisexuals or Queer. But the corporate trash who run the Gay Agenda keep putting anything and anyone who is not heterosexual in that alphabet rubbish as if they’re trying to go through the entire alphabet 2-3 times. There are already two Qs in the thing. And at that time when Newsom started gay marriage — which the article failed to say — as I remember trans was not an issue because the trans issue had not yet hijacked the Gay Agenda or the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement. The hijacking came later, and trans began riding on the coattails of the accomplishments of Queers (the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement). But it was then that everything was about trans, trans, trans. And today, trans is the face of the Queer so-called “community.” Why? When again, trans has nothing to do with Queer. My problem with that, as I’ve written many times, is that gay or Queer is about same gender attraction. Trans is about feeling one was born the wrong gender. Feeling one was born the wrong gender has absolutely nothing to do with gay or Queer. Therefore, the trans group should be their own group and rather than hijacking on the coattails of the Queer so-called “community.”
Thinking about it, I’ve never known any gay guy or lesbian who said that they wanted to change their gender, even some rather effeminate guys never said that. Some of the most masculine females never said that. I never heard it, so why is trans part of the gay so-called “community?” I and others don’t understand that at all.
Therefore, trans should not be part of the Queer group as I’ve written many times, but rather their own thing. In some cases, trans people live heterosexual lives with kids so they already had a group. It’s called straight, and trans individuals seem to be attracted to the sexual opposite of what they are. So in some cases, other than feeling one was born the wrong gender, one wonders: Well, if you want to do that (whatever it is) sexually, the rational person asks: why didn’t you just stay the gender you were born and continue to do what turns you on sexually?
And what about changing one’s gender? Even though it seems to be the latest fad with some people, it should only be done after intensive and credible psychotherapy, in my opinion, because it is such a monumental decision. And one shouldn’t go to a therapist who will tell the client what s/he wants to hear. The therapist should be objective.
Of the trans people I’ve known and/or talked with, they have been obsessed with trans. It seems to be all they think about 24/7. The same with many lesbians and the same with a few gay guys. In my opinion, one’s sexuality — although to be clear, trans is not a sexuality — should just be a matter of fact and not something one thinks about/obsesses over constantly.
So again, when Newsom began same gender marriage, trans had been thrown under the bus by the Human Rights Campaign. That’s how I remember it. Today, trans is all that the Gay Agenda seems to be concerned about, along with seeing how many more fucking letters they can add to the current string of letters. It’s also what one sees at that Pride nonsense every Summer: Mostly a sea of females in the streets (people who were born female and guys who have changed their physical appearance to look like a female). I referred to the Pride nonsense because why would anyone be “proud” of their sexuality regardless of what they are? One’s sexuality should just be a matter of fact. I assert that “Pride” is the wrong word. Then there’s all of that ludicrous language change, such as “nonbinary” and “binary” and the ridiculous pronoun crap that the Gay Agenda came up with. These days, the cultists of the Gay Agenda have to say, “the gender one was assigned at birth.” They can’t just say, “the person was born female or male.” It has nothing to do with “assigning gender.” Ugh, these people! I can’t stand the Gay Agenda and the ludicrous stuff they’ve come up.
As for Newsom, he probably realises he will get along better with the convicted felon/sexual predator and international bully if he becomes more like him politically, and that’s what he’s doing regardless of looking like a hypocrite.
Most politicians don’t much care about looking like a hypocrite. So it won’t surprise me if Newsom continues to hook up with the cultists of the far-right as he makes his change to the right, if that’s what he plans to do. So will Newsom gradually become a white supremacist/nazi like the current trash in the US Kremlin (formerly known as the white house) and like the Republican nazis/trash in the US Congress who see the convicted felon and sexual predator as their god? Possibly. It won’t surprise me.
But it cannot be overstated, that trans should not be part of the Queer so-called “community” and trans should be removed accordingly — be their own thing or part of the heterosexual group — but I live under no illusions that will ever happen.
Update 20 March 2025: