Update 3 November 2024: My friend was watching Rachel and called me over to his PC. He said, “I thought you’d like to see this. There she is in her black shroud get-up, something she never wears [sarcasm intended].” I said: Yes, there it is. Once again. But the thing that struck me about it once again was how low-cut it was, and I pointed that out to him. He said, “Yes, she’s married.” I said: So who is this lesbian trying to appeal to by wearing this low-cut get up? I take it she must have one of these black shroud get-ups for every day of the week, no? He said: “Or she wears the same one each day and washes it occasionally. But just like with white clothing, black clothing shows dirt easily.” That’s true. It starts to take on a certain “has-been” or matted look and gets this slick sheen to it. On another topic but related to clothing: And then there’s that insane fist-pumping schoolyard bully piece of garbage who’s running for US president — I can’t stand him and have no respect for him and never have — who wears the same blue suit, white shirt and long red tie every time I have the misfortune of seeing his puss. Does he have multiple “copies” of that too, or is it the same get up he wears at his nazi cult rallies? Hopefully after the 2024 election in the United States of North America and we have President-elect Kamala Harris, “we” will never have to hear his name or see it in print again. I’m sick of hearing about him and sick of seeing him. You would think he’s the only guy on the planet the way the media are obsessed with him and report his every insane and deranged/pro-violent actions. And no, I live under no illusions this convicted felon will ever serve a day in prison, especially since the right-wing trash on the US Supreme Court have granted him immunity as if he’s some monarch or something. It’s just more insanity here in The Century of Insanity. I’m still trying to understand how a convicted felon can run for US president. Something is clearly wrong there.

Update 23 August 2024: I wrote this article — what seems like — several years ago and Rachel is still wearing the same get up. I’d be embarrassed to do that or to be seen in the same get up constantly. I saw her tonight following the conclusion of the superb Democratic National Convention. It’s the best one they’ve ever had. What I saw of the Convention was outstanding. It’s as if they used Univisión’s Latin Grammy’s as a model, minus the LED light shows which the DNC should have had. But there was Rachel, years after I wrote this article and she is STILL wearing the same clothes. I can’t think of anyone else before a camera who wears the same thing every time they’re on camera. And why would a lesbian wear something low-cut? Who is she trying to appeal to with showing cleavage when the woman already has a partner? Of course if the guys on the set dressed in a similar way or were wearing a nice looking tank top, they’d be ordered to go home and come back “dressed appropriately.” It’s the same double standard that one sees in the classical music world where women can be half-naked and guys have to be completely covered up like monks. End of Update.

And apparently she goes to a funeral before every show she does because she shows up on every show in the same low-cut black shroud. Who is she trying to appeal to with the low-cut thing?

How many copies of that conservative black top does she own? Since she wears the same thing every time you see her.

So much for the idea of “women should never be seen wearing the same thing twice” which used to be the case when it came to women’s fashions.

I never watch Rachel but my friend does on occasion and I saw his screen today and there she was: Rachel with her jet black hair (out of a bottle?) and that low cut black shroud thing she’s always wearing.

Does she realise how conservative she looks?

When did lesbians start to like showing cleavage or much of their chest? Imagine if a guy sat before the camera looking the same way and showing much of his chest. He’d be jeered off the set, but Rachel and other females get a way with it, for some reason. It’s the same way in the classical music field. Females can come out half naked for a performance but guys have to be covered up like monks. There is such discrimination or a discrepancy between the genders when it comes to dress. Guys are not supposed to “show skin.” Females can bare it all; show all the “skin” they want.

In our sexist society, it’s considered “sexy” and Rachel’s cultists are in full support of this sexism, whilst pretending any other time to not be sexist and to be so-called “liberals” and “progressives.”

As expected, Rachel’s cultists have told me: “I think she looks good on the set. She looks very professional.” Funeral black is “professional?” What funeral did Rachel just come from? Black is a very bold and drab, depressing colour. Of course if her cultists disagreed with her politics, they would be saying the same thing I’m writing here.

Rachel’s cultists leave out that she looks very, very conservative — just like the Republicans — whilst pretending to be “liberal” or “progressive,” whatever she considers herself to be. Of course if Rachel were a Republican or one of their cultists, her devout supporters would be agreeing with me. But being devout D partisans/cultists ultimately, they’re in lockstep with Rachel and anything she says or does. That’s the way cultists work. Just like the village idiot’s cultists and their blind faith in and blind devotion to that piece of trash.

My friend tells me Rachel is considered “a radical” by the way she dresses. Radical? There’s nothing that looks radical by the way she dresses. Who came up with that nonsense? All-black clothing with jet-black hair is now considered “rad?” I. Don’t. Think. So. Again, she looks no differently than the conservatives in their all-black except for the low-cut thing. But other than that, she fits in nicely with the Republican women/supporters and the way they dress: Very conservative. That’s being objective which most people can’t stand. Most people want me to be partisan and part of their cult and for their team. Politically, I’m an independent. I don’t cheer lead for any of these cults, teams or what they call political parties.